Bautista v. Kapp
This text of 703 So. 2d 1173 (Bautista v. Kapp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s final judgment of paternity. At her deposition, the guardian ad litem should have fully disclosed the nature of her past professional relationship with the father’s attorney. By a motion, the mother made the trial court aware of the non-disclosure prior to the issuance of the final judgment. The non-disclosure went to the credibility of the guardian, a matter within the discretion of the trial court. The trial court determined that there was no conflict of interest that would “affect the rights of the children” and we do not find that decision to be an abuse of discretion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
703 So. 2d 1173, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14047, 1997 WL 770605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bautista-v-kapp-fladistctapp-1997.