Bautista v. Clemson University

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1396

GLORIA BAUTISTA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CLEMSON UNIVERSITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (8:07-cv-01287-HFF)

Submitted: March 24, 2010 Decided: April 1, 2010

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin Hutson, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. James W. Logan, Jr., LOGAN, JOLLY & SMITH, LLP, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gloria Bautista appeals the district court’s order

adopting the magistrate judge’s reports and recommendations to

grant Defendant’s summary judgment motion on her race and

national origin discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.

§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s order. Bautista v. Clemson Univ., No. 8:07-cv-01287-HFF

(D.S.C. Mar. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED