Bausley v. Bender

110 F. App'x 736
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 13, 2004
DocketNo. 04-2452
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 110 F. App'x 736 (Bausley v. Bender) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bausley v. Bender, 110 F. App'x 736 (8th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles Bausley appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action claiming defendant jail personnel violated his constitutional rights by moving him to a different cell after a fight, without letting him present his version of the incident, and by seizing property from his cell. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude dismissal was proper for the reasons the district court stated. See Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 486, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995); Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 525-36, 104 S.Ct. 3194, 82 L.Ed.2d 393 (1984). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunston v. Sanchez
E.D. Arkansas, 2025
Pierce v. Stayley
E.D. Arkansas, 2025

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 F. App'x 736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bausley-v-bender-ca8-2004.