Baureis v. Ketterer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Baureis v. Ketterer

873 S.W.2d 627, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 477, 1994 WL 88107

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 22, 1994·No. No. 64361·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendants, Edward and Dorothy Ketterer, appeal the rescission of a contract for the sale of certain riverfront property to Plaintiff, Joan Baureis. Defendants also assert error in the court’s calculation of damages. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm by written order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our holding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendants, Edward and Dorothy Ketterer, appeal the rescission of a contract for the sale of certain riverfront property to Plaintiff, Joan Baureis. Defendants also assert error in the court’s calculation of damages. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm by written order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our holding.

Baureis v. Ketterer, 873 S.W.2d 627, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 477, 1994 WL 88107 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

873 S.W.2d 627 (Baureis v. Ketterer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.