Baunach v. Liebman
119 A. 629, 98 N.J.L. 554, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 246
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Tins Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Whyte, Ueppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baunach v. Liebman, 119 A. 629, 98 N.J.L. 554, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 246 (N.J. 1923).
119 A. 629 (Baunach v. Liebman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hurley v. Sternick
130 A. 634 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1925)