Baunach v. Liebman
119 A. 629, 98 N.J.L. 554, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 246
This text of 119 A. 629 (Baunach v. Liebman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Baunach v. Liebman, 119 A. 629, 98 N.J.L. 554, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 246 (N.J. 1923).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Tins Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Whyte, Ueppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hurley v. Sternick
130 A. 634 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1925)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
119 A. 629, 98 N.J.L. 554, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baunach-v-liebman-nj-1923.