Baum's Appeal

4 Pennyp. 25
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 28, 1884·No. No. 23·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

No fact is shown to justify the Court in interfering with the large discretionary power given to the executors as to the time of selling the real estate, and the unanimous consent of all the grandchildren to take “the unsold land instead of the proceeds thereof” had not been obtained.

The petition was, • therefore, properly dismissed.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baum's Appeal, 4 Pennyp. 25 (Pa. 1884).

4 Pennyp. 25 (Baum's Appeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young's Estate
8 Pa. D. & C. 267 (Dauphin County Orphans' Court, 1926)