Baumgartner v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Baumgartner v. State

111 N.E.2d 727, 232 Ind. 236, 1953 Ind. LEXIS 188

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedApril 24, 1953

DocketNo. 28,969

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 111 N.E.2d 727 (Baumgartner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baumgartner v. State, 111 N.E.2d 727, 232 Ind. 236, 1953 Ind. LEXIS 188 (Ind. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Flanagan, J.

The charge is sodomy. Appellant contends that the affidavit is insufficient because it does not aver the commission of the alleged act “with mankind or beast,” as the statute requires. Section 10-4221, Burns’ 1942 Replacement. The Attorney General' of Indiana has filed a brief in which he agrees with appellant, and states that he feels this constitutes reversible error.

We have examined the affidavit and the statute. We find the appellant and the Attorney General correct.

Judgment reversed, with instructions to sustain appellant’s motion to quash the affidavit.

Note. — Reported in 111 N. E. 2d 727.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI