Baumgarten v. David

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baumgarten v. David

21 A.D.2d 890, 252 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3266

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 9, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 21 A.D.2d 890 (Baumgarten v. David) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baumgarten v. David, 21 A.D.2d 890, 252 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3266 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

In a paternity proceeding under former article VIII (§ 119 et seq.) of the Domestic Relations Law, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, entered June 28, 1963 upon the court’s decision and opinion after a nonjury trial, dismissing the complaint. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Hill, J., dissents, and votes to reverse the order and to direct an order of filiation against the respondent, with the following memorandum: In my opinion, under all the circumstances disclosed in the instant record, the petitioner sustained the required burden of proof by “ entirely satisfactory ” evidence as defined in numerous eases (see, e.g., Commissioner of Public Works [McNamee] v. Ryan, 238 App. Div. 607, 608; Commissioner of Public Welfare of City of N. Y. v. Kotel, 256 App. Div. 352). Hence, a finding and order of filiation against the respondent should have been made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a paternity proceeding under former article VIII (§ 119 et seq.) of the Domestic Relations Law, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, entered June 28, 1963 upon the court’s decision and opinion after a nonjury trial, dismissing the complaint. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Hill, J., dissents, and votes to reverse the order and to direct an order of filiation against the respondent, with the following memorandum: In my opinion, under all the circumstances disclosed in the instant record, the petitioner sustained the required burden of proof by “ entirely satisfactory ” evidence as defined in numerous eases (see, e.g., Commissioner of Public Works [McNamee] v. Ryan, 238 App. Div. 607, 608; Commissioner of Public Welfare of City of N. Y. v. Kotel, 256 App. Div. 352). Hence, a finding and order of filiation against the respondent should have been made.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A.D.2d 890, 252 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baumgarten-v-david-nyappdiv-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack