Baumgardner v. State

603 So. 2d 510, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 582, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1569, 1992 WL 212014
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 3, 1992·No. No. 78689·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Upon the authority of Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla.1992), we quash State v. Baumgardner, 587 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), and remand with directions to reinstate Baumgardner’s probation.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW and KOGAN, JJ., concur. GRIMES, J., dissents with an opinion, in which HARDING, J, concur. McDONALD, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baumgardner v. State, 603 So. 2d 510, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 582, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1569, 1992 WL 212014 (Fla. 1992).

603 So. 2d 510 (Baumgardner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Baumgardner
587 So. 2d 1147 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Scates v. State
603 So. 2d 504 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)