Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Baumgardner v. State

Baumgardner v. State

603 So. 2d 510, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 582, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1569, 1992 WL 212014
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 3, 1992
DocketNo. 78689
StatusPublished

This text of 603 So. 2d 510 (Baumgardner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baumgardner v. State, 603 So. 2d 510, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 582, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1569, 1992 WL 212014 (Fla. 1992).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Upon the authority of Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla.1992), we quash State v. Baumgardner, 587 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), and remand with directions to reinstate Baumgardner’s probation.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW and KOGAN, JJ., concur. GRIMES, J., dissents with an opinion, in which HARDING, J, concur. McDONALD, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Baumgardner
587 So. 2d 1147 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Scates v. State
603 So. 2d 504 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
603 So. 2d 510, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 582, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1569, 1992 WL 212014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baumgardner-v-state-fla-1992.