Baumert v. Ambler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baumert v. Ambler

230 A.D. 705

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1930·Published

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. A declaratory judgment was properly withheld in the exercise of sound discretion. The record does not adequately disclose the nature and extent of the proposed use, which proposed use could, in some phases and in possible uses, take on the attributes of a business and, therefore, come within the condemnation of the covenant. (Carmody N. Y. Pr. [Book I] § 301; Westchester Mortgage Co. v. G. R. & I. R. R. Co., 246 N. Y. 194.) Present— Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. A declaratory judgment was properly withheld in the exercise of sound discretion. The record does not adequately disclose the nature and extent of the proposed use, which proposed use could, in some phases and in possible uses, take on the attributes of a business and, therefore, come within the condemnation of the covenant. (Carmody N. Y. Pr. [Book I] § 301; Westchester Mortgage Co. v. G. R. & I. R. R. Co., 246 N. Y. 194.) Present— Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ.

Baumert v. Ambler, 230 A.D. 705 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

230 A.D. 705 (Baumert v. Ambler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related