Baumeister v. James McCreery & Co.
This text of 207 A.D. 854 (Baumeister v. James McCreery & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs, upon authority of Linker v. Jamison (173 App. Div. 349, and cases therein cited). Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Young. JJ., concur; Kelly, P. J., dissents upon the ground that it is apparent that the trial of the issue as to the release will practically depend upon the' same evidence as will be required upon the trial of the main action, and under these circumstances we should not interfere with the discretion vested in the court at Special Term. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 443, subd. 3.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
207 A.D. 854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baumeister-v-james-mccreery-co-nyappdiv-1923.