Baumbach v. Cook

Court of Appeals of Texas

Baumbach v. Cook

2 Wilson 82

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 26, 1884

DocketNo. 1555

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Wilson 82 (Baumbach v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baumbach v. Cook, 2 Wilson 82 (Tex. Ct. App. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 100. Appeal bond; competency of surety upon. 0. sued J. F. B. and G. B. in justice’s court, and recovered judgment against J. F. B. only — recovering nothing against G. B. J. F. B. appealed to the county court, giving as sureties upon his appeal bond the said G. B. and another person. Held, that G. B., being no longer a party to the suit, and no appeal being taken from the judgment in his favor, he was a competent surety upon the appeal bond of J. F. B., and that the county court erred in holding otherwise and dismissing the appeal.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 100. Appeal bond; competency of surety upon. 0. sued J. F. B. and G. B. in justice’s court, and recovered judgment against J. F. B. only — recovering nothing against G. B. J. F. B. appealed to the county court, giving as sureties upon his appeal bond the said G. B. and another person. Held, that G. B., being no longer a party to the suit, and no appeal being taken from the judgment in his favor, he was a competent surety upon the appeal bond of J. F. B., and that the county court erred in holding otherwise and dismissing the appeal.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Wilson 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baumbach-v-cook-texapp-1884.