Baumann v. Universal Holding Corp.

22 Misc. 2d 206, 203 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3134
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedApril 20, 1960
StatusPublished

This text of 22 Misc. 2d 206 (Baumann v. Universal Holding Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baumann v. Universal Holding Corp., 22 Misc. 2d 206, 203 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3134 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1960).

Opinion

Mario Pittoni, J.

Motion by defendant Gragol Corp. in a personal injury action to vacate service of process granted. Service of the summons in this action was made on the barmaid at the Zig Zag Inn, East Meadow, operated by defendant Graeol Corp. The president of the corporation submitted proof that he is the sole officer and director of the corporation and was in Florida when process was served. He has never been served nor was the Secretary of State, an officer, director, stockholder or general manager of the corporation. Plaintiff must comply with section 228 of the Civil Practice Act which prescribes the methods of effecting personal service of a summons upon a domestic corporation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Misc. 2d 206, 203 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baumann-v-universal-holding-corp-nysupct-1960.