Baumann v. Stetten, Baumann

180 N.E. 353, 258 N.Y. 607, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 1270
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 16, 1932
StatusPublished

This text of 180 N.E. 353 (Baumann v. Stetten, Baumann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baumann v. Stetten, Baumann, 180 N.E. 353, 258 N.Y. 607, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 1270 (N.Y. 1932).

Opinion

Motion by plaintiff for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements.

Motions to amend remittitur granted to the following extent; return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended, first, so as to provide that the respondents Berenice L. Baumann, Elizabeth Baumann and Charles Baumann are not entitled to costs at the Appellate Division as against the defendants Stetten and Greenbaum; and, second, so as to provide that the matter of compensation of the special guardian be remitted to the Special Term there to be dealt with as that court may be advised. (See 257 N. Y. 480.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baumann v. Stetten
178 N.E. 764 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 N.E. 353, 258 N.Y. 607, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 1270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baumann-v-stetten-baumann-ny-1932.