Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Baumann v. Naugle

Baumann v. Naugle

130 A. 917, 98 N.J. Eq. 687, 13 Stock. 687, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 603
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 29, 1925·Published

Opinion

Pee Cuetam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

For affirmance- — The Chiee-Justice, Parker, Minturn, Kaltsoh, Black, Katzenbaoi-i, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Bus kirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baumann v. Naugle, 130 A. 917, 98 N.J. Eq. 687, 13 Stock. 687, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 603 (N.J. 1925).

130 A. 917 (Baumann v. Naugle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.