Baumann v. Naugle
130 A. 917, 98 N.J. Eq. 687, 13 Stock. 687, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 603
This text of 130 A. 917 (Baumann v. Naugle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Baumann v. Naugle, 130 A. 917, 98 N.J. Eq. 687, 13 Stock. 687, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 603 (N.J. 1925).
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.
For affirmance- — The Chiee-Justice, Parker, Minturn, Kaltsoh, Black, Katzenbaoi-i, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Bus kirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
130 A. 917, 98 N.J. Eq. 687, 13 Stock. 687, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baumann-v-naugle-nj-1925.