Baumann v. A. C. Ochs Brick Tile Company
This text of 246 N.W. 249 (Baumann v. A. C. Ochs Brick Tile Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
For an injury the relator was awarded compensation by a referee for a period of 47 4/7 weeks. No appeal was taken to the industrial commission, and after the time for appeal had expired the relator moved to vacate the award and for a rehearing. The petition to vacate was supported and opposed by affidavits from a number of physicians, and the question presented to the commission was clearly one of fact.
We discover no abuse of discretion on the part of the commission in denying the relief sought. Ogrosky v. Commonwealth Elec. Co. 172 Minn. 46, 214 N. W. 765; Kallgren v. C. W. Lunquist Co. 172 Minn. 489, 216 N. W. 241; Dotlich v. Shenango Furnace Co. 172 Minn. 603, 216 N. W. 242.
Writ discharged and order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 N.W. 249, 187 Minn. 586, 1933 Minn. LEXIS 855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baumann-v-a-c-ochs-brick-tile-company-minn-1933.