Bauman v. United Parcel Service

244 S.W.3d 771, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 152, 2008 WL 222320
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 29, 2008·No. ED 89824·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, modifying the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Employer’s motion to dismiss claimant’s brief is denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bauman v. United Parcel Service, 244 S.W.3d 771, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 152, 2008 WL 222320 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

244 S.W.3d 771 (Bauman v. United Parcel Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jamison v. State
244 S.W.3d 771 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)