Bauman v. United Parcel Service
Opinion
ORDER
Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, modifying the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Employer’s motion to dismiss claimant’s brief is denied as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
244 S.W.3d 771 (Bauman v. United Parcel Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.