Bauman v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Bauman v. State

2 Ill. Ct. Cl. 276, 1914 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 16

Court of Claims of Illinois·Decided November 19, 1914·Published

Opinion

This is one of the so-called Utica bridge cases, and its decision is controlled by the decisions of the Morrissey and Farmer cases.

The attending physician testified that there was a laceration of the scalp with no other injury. Claimant complains of headaches, and says she cannot do heavy work.

It is the judgment of the Court, that the claim be denied, without prejudice to the right of claimant to prey sent her claim to the legislature, and with the state - ment, that if it were within our power, we would award to claimant the sum of one hundred dollars.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is one of the so-called Utica bridge cases, and its decision is controlled by the decisions of the Morrissey and Farmer cases.

The attending physician testified that there was a laceration of the scalp with no other injury. Claimant complains of headaches, and says she cannot do heavy work.

It is the judgment of the Court, that the claim be denied, without prejudice to the right of claimant to prey sent her claim to the legislature, and with the state - ment, that if it were within our power, we would award to claimant the sum of one hundred dollars.

Bauman v. State, 2 Ill. Ct. Cl. 276, 1914 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 16 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1914).

Pincite

2 Ill. Ct. Cl. 276 (Bauman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.