Bauman v. Ross

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bauman v. Ross

9 App. D.C. 260, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 3111

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided September 29, 1896·No. Nos. 626 and 627·Published

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Alvey

delivered the opinion of the Court:

In the case of the District of Columbia, appellant, against Charles H. Armes and others, No. 552, January Term, 1896, (8 App. D. C. 393,) this court had occasion to consider the questions of law which are now here raised by the appeal and cross-appeal from the decree of the court below set forth in the record. On the authority of that case, the decree herein of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, holding a District Court of the United States for said District, must be affirmed, with costs; and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Alvey

delivered the opinion of the Court:

In the case of the District of Columbia, appellant, against Charles H. Armes and others, No. 552, January Term, 1896, (8 App. D. C. 393,) this court had occasion to consider the questions of law which are now here raised by the appeal and cross-appeal from the decree of the court below set forth in the record. On the authority of that case, the decree herein of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, holding a District Court of the United States for said District, must be affirmed, with costs; and it is so ordered.

Bauman v. Ross, 9 App. D.C. 260, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 3111 (D.C. 1896).

Pincite

9 App. D.C. 260 (Bauman v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.