Bauman v. Ottaviano
This text of 126 A.D.3d 742 (Bauman v. Ottaviano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pastoressa, J.), dated January 8, 2014, which denied his motion for leave to renew his opposition to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that he did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident, which had been granted in a prior order of the same court dated July 11, 2013.
Ordered that the order dated January 8, 2014, is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying title plaintiffs motion for leave to renew his opposition to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the new evidence submitted would have changed the prior determination (see CPLR 2221 [e]; Loverde v Gill, 108 AD3d 748 [2013]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
126 A.D.3d 742, 2 N.Y.S.3d 808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bauman-v-ottaviano-nyappdiv-2015.