Bauman v. Daimlerchrysler Corp

Ninth Circuit

Bauman v. Daimlerchrysler Corp

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 28, 2014

Docket07-15386

StatusPublished

This text of Bauman v. Daimlerchrysler Corp (Bauman v. Daimlerchrysler Corp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bauman v. Daimlerchrysler Corp, (9th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BARBARA BAUMAN; GREGORY No. 07-15386 GRIECO; JOSEFINA NUNEZ; GABRIELE NUNEZ; MIRIAM NUNEZ; D.C. No. SILVIA NUNEZ; EMILIO GUILLERMO CV-04-00194- PESCE; MIRTA HAYDEE ARENAS; RMW GRACIELA GIGENA; GUILLERMO ALBERTO GIGENA, NURIA GIGENA; AMELIA SCHIAFFO; ELBA LEICHNER; ORDER ANUNCIACION SPALTRO DE BELMONTE; HECTOR RATTO; EDUARDO OLASIREGUI; RICARDO MARTIN HOFFMAN; EDUARDO ESTIVILLE; ALFREDO MANUEL MARTIN; JUAN JOSE MARTIN; JOSE BARREIRO; ALEJANDRO DAER, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION and DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG, Defendants-Appellees.

Filed February 28, 2014

On Remand From The United States Supreme Court 2 BAUMAN V. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP.

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Dorothy W. Nelson, and Stephen Reinhardt, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In accordance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of January 14, 2014, as well as the resulting judgment, the district court’s order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI