Bauman v. Cowdin
74 A. 1135, 76 N.J.L. 575, 47 Vroom 575, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 182
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bauman v. Cowdin. Read the opinion of the Court — 75 N.J.L. 193 →
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chief Justice, Bergen, Yooehees, Minturn, Yredenburgh, Yeoom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 9.
For reversal—Ti-ie Chancellor, Parker, Bogert, J.J. 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bauman v. Cowdin, 74 A. 1135, 76 N.J.L. 575, 47 Vroom 575, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 182 (N.J. 1908).
74 A. 1135 (Bauman v. Cowdin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.