Baum v. Town of Oyster Bay

281 A.D.2d 504, 721 N.Y.S.2d 799, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2611

This text of 281 A.D.2d 504 (Baum v. Town of Oyster Bay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baum v. Town of Oyster Bay, 281 A.D.2d 504, 721 N.Y.S.2d 799, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2611 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), entered March 27, 2000, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based upon the doctrine of assumption of the risk (see, Lo Piccolo v Town of Oyster Bay, Dept. of Parks, 260 AD2d 606; Byrne v Westchester County, 178 AD2d 575). O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Byrne v. Westchester County
178 A.D.2d 575 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Lo Piccolo v. Town of Oyster Bay
260 A.D.2d 606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 A.D.2d 504, 721 N.Y.S.2d 799, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baum-v-town-of-oyster-bay-nyappdiv-2001.