Baum v. Town of Oyster Bay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baum v. Town of Oyster Bay

281 A.D.2d 504, 721 N.Y.S.2d 799, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2611

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 19, 2001·Published

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), entered March 27, 2000, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based upon the doctrine of assumption of the risk (see, Lo Piccolo v Town of Oyster Bay, Dept. of Parks, 260 AD2d 606; Byrne v Westchester County, 178 AD2d 575). O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), entered March 27, 2000, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based upon the doctrine of assumption of the risk (see, Lo Piccolo v Town of Oyster Bay, Dept. of Parks, 260 AD2d 606; Byrne v Westchester County, 178 AD2d 575). O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Baum v. Town of Oyster Bay, 281 A.D.2d 504, 721 N.Y.S.2d 799, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2611 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

281 A.D.2d 504 (Baum v. Town of Oyster Bay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related