Baum v. State
This text of 66 Ind. 601 (Baum v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is substantially the same, in all respects, as the case of Perkins v. The State, 65 Ind. 317. The appellant, Baum, and Perkins were jointly indicted for the same offence, growing out of the same transaction. Upon separate trials, they were severally convicted upon substantially the same evidence, and each of them appealed to this court. Manifestly, therefore, this cause must bo decided as the case cited was decided, and for the same reasons.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded for a new trial ; and the clerk of this court will issue notice, to the warden of the proper prison, to return the appellant, Baum, into the custody of the sheriff of Clinton county, to abide the further order of the Clinton Circuit Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 Ind. 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baum-v-state-ind-1879.