Home/California Supreme Court/Baum v. Reay

Baum v. Reay

31 P. 561, 96 Cal. 462, 1892 Cal. LEXIS 978
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 22, 1892
DocketNo. 14208
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 31 P. 561 (Baum v. Reay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baum v. Reay, 31 P. 561, 96 Cal. 462, 1892 Cal. LEXIS 978 (Cal. 1892).

Opinions

The Court.

— This cause was heard and decided in Department One. We are satisfied with the views therein expressed and the conclusion reached; but in support of the ruling of the court below in excluding the inventory offered in evidence by the defendant, we cite the follow[465]*465ing cases: Leighton v. Wike, 4 Serg. & R. 204; Aelclen’s Executor v. Hickman, 63 Ala. 494. The rule in New York has been changed (Guy v. Mead, 22 N. Y. 466); but our code seems to indorse the rule followed in Pennsylvania and Alabama, and which formerly prevailed in New York. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 2047.)

The judgment and order are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of McCarthy
15 P.2d 223 (California Court of Appeal, 1932)
Estate of Regnart
283 P. 860 (California Court of Appeal, 1929)
County of Los Angeles v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.
269 P. 767 (California Court of Appeal, 1928)
Goodrich v. Mortimer
186 P. 844 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
Marcone v. Dowell
173 P. 465 (California Supreme Court, 1918)
Earl v. San Francisco Bridge Co.
160 P. 570 (California Court of Appeal, 1916)
Strauss v. Phenix Insurance
9 Colo. App. 386 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 P. 561, 96 Cal. 462, 1892 Cal. LEXIS 978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baum-v-reay-cal-1892.