Baum v. Pines Realty, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Baum v. Pines Realty, Inc.

193 So. 2d 186, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4728

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 14, 1966

DocketNo. 6900

StatusPublished

This text of 193 So. 2d 186 (Baum v. Pines Realty, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baum v. Pines Realty, Inc., 193 So. 2d 186, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4728 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The law of this case was settled by our decision in Baum v. Pines Realty, Inc. et al., 164 So.2d 517. We find, upon an inspection-of the record, that the final decree from which this appeal is taken, conforms, with one exception, to the law of the case as-previously laid down. The decree should' have been against the appellees, who were-the defendants below, jointly and not severally. For this reason the final decree is reversed with instructions to the [187]*187■cliancellor to amend the decree by making -the defendants named therein jointly liable for the payment of all sums found to be due -•the plaintiff. In all other respects the ■decree is affirmed.

SHANNON, Acting C. J., HOBSON, J., and WILLSON, J. H., Associate Judge, •concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The law of this case was settled by our decision in Baum v. Pines Realty, Inc. et al., 164 So.2d 517. We find, upon an inspection-of the record, that the final decree from which this appeal is taken, conforms, with one exception, to the law of the case as-previously laid down. The decree should' have been against the appellees, who were-the defendants below, jointly and not severally. For this reason the final decree is reversed with instructions to the [187]*187■cliancellor to amend the decree by making -the defendants named therein jointly liable for the payment of all sums found to be due -•the plaintiff. In all other respects the ■decree is affirmed.

SHANNON, Acting C. J., HOBSON, J., and WILLSON, J. H., Associate Judge, •concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 So. 2d 186, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baum-v-pines-realty-inc-fladistctapp-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack