Baum v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States
This text of 148 Misc. 322 (Baum v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the provisions of the policy the plaintiff is not precluded from recovering for disability resulting from disease by reason of the fact that he was confined in prison during the period of disability. We construe the policy as providing for compensation for the disability rather than for indemnity for loss of earnings (Suttles v. Railway Mail Association, 156 App. Div. 435), and we construe the provision of the policy that the disability must be such as to “ prevent him from performing any and every duty pertaining to his occupation ” as descriptive of the disease which shall entitle the plaintiff to disability payments.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
All concur; present, Levy, Callahan and Untermyer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
148 Misc. 322, 265 N.Y.S. 786, 1933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baum-v-equitable-life-assurance-society-of-united-states-nyappterm-1933.