Baum v. Bee Line, Inc.
231 A.D. 761
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1930
StatusPublished
This text of 231 A.D. 761 (Baum v. Bee Line, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Baum v. Bee Line, Inc., 231 A.D. 761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
Opinion
Judgment reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. In our opinion, prejudicial error was committed by the court in receiving in evidence the statement made by the witness See, dated May 15, 1927. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
231 A.D. 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baum-v-bee-line-inc-nyappdiv-1930.