Baum v. Altman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baum v. Altman

200 A.D.2d 486, 608 N.Y.S.2d 813

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 20, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 200 A.D.2d 486 (Baum v. Altman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baum v. Altman, 200 A.D.2d 486, 608 N.Y.S.2d 813 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol H. Arber, J.), entered on or about October 28, 1992, which granted plaintiff’s motion to increase the ad damnum clause on condition that he serve an amended complaint within 30 days, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS Court did not abuse its discretion in granting plaintiff’s motion to amend his ad damnum clause, there being no showing of prejudice. Plaintiff’s actual damages may also include the cost of the bankruptcy petition. Concur — Murphy, P. J, Carro, Asch and Kupferman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol H. Arber, J.), entered on or about October 28, 1992, which granted plaintiff’s motion to increase the ad damnum clause on condition that he serve an amended complaint within 30 days, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS Court did not abuse its discretion in granting plaintiff’s motion to amend his ad damnum clause, there being no showing of prejudice. Plaintiff’s actual damages may also include the cost of the bankruptcy petition. Concur — Murphy, P. J, Carro, Asch and Kupferman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 A.D.2d 486, 608 N.Y.S.2d 813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baum-v-altman-nyappdiv-1994.