Baum-Mercado v. Renzaneth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baum-Mercado v. Renzaneth

12 A.D.3d 1108, 784 N.Y.S.2d 407, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13921

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.3d 1108 (Baum-Mercado v. Renzaneth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baum-Mercado v. Renzaneth, 12 A.D.3d 1108, 784 N.Y.S.2d 407, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (David G. Klim, J.), entered September 30, 2003. The order denied the petition for an order modifying a previous order awarding sole custody of the parties’ child to respondent.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Family Court. Present—Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Gorski and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (David G. Klim, J.), entered September 30, 2003. The order denied the petition for an order modifying a previous order awarding sole custody of the parties’ child to respondent.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Family Court. Present—Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Gorski and Hayes, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.3d 1108, 784 N.Y.S.2d 407, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baum-mercado-v-renzaneth-nyappdiv-2004.