Bauknight v. Bauknight

Supreme Court of Florida

Bauknight v. Bauknight

152 So. 711, 114 Fla. 3, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1761

DecidedFebruary 12, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 152 So. 711 (Bauknight v. Bauknight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bauknight v. Bauknight, 152 So. 711, 114 Fla. 3, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1761 (Fla. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript; of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and *4 inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript; of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and *4 inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 So. 711, 114 Fla. 3, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bauknight-v-bauknight-fla-1934.