Baughman, Michael Scott

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 14, 2014
DocketWR-80,792-03
StatusPublished

This text of Baughman, Michael Scott (Baughman, Michael Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baughman, Michael Scott, (Tex. 2014).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS




NOS. WR-80,792-03 & WR-80,792-04




EX PARTE MICHAEL SCOTT BAUGHMAN, Applicant





ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 2012F00133 & 2013F00091 IN THE 5TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM CASS COUNTY




            Per curiam.


O P I N I O N


            Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of sexual assault of a child and retaliation and sentenced to eleven and ten years’ imprisonment, respectively.

            Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to timely file notices of appeal.

            The trial court has determined that counsel failed to timely file notices of appeal. We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file out-of-time appeals of the judgments of convictions in Cause Nos. 2012F00133 and 2013F00091 from the 5th District Court of Cass County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give written notices of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain meaningful appeals. It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine if Applicant is represented by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentences had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file written notices of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

            Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: May 14, 2014

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Baughman, Michael Scott, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baughman-michael-scott-texcrimapp-2014.