Baughman ex rel. Over v. Divler

3 Yeates 9
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 15, 1800·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant examined his witness, but not being able to establish a sale of the goods, a verdict was directed to be given against him for 671. 2s. 7d. the full balance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baughman ex rel. Over v. Divler, 3 Yeates 9 (Pa. 1800).

3 Yeates 9 (Baughman ex rel. Over v. Divler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Romig v. Erdman
5 Whart. 112 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1840)