Baugher v. State

468 So. 2d 441, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1112, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13808
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 3, 1985·No. No. 84-2055·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error; therefore, the revocation of appellant’s probation is affirmed. However, we remand this case to the trial court for correction of the order of revocation.

Appellant was charged with violating the conditions of his probation by failing to pay the costs of his supervision, failing to maintain employment, and possessing and selling marijuana. At the probation revocation hearing, the trial court found the appellant guilty only of selling marijuana and failing to pay the costs of his supervision. The trial court’s written order, however, found the appellant guilty of all the charges alleged in the violation of probation affidavit. Since the order varies from the court’s oral findings, the case is remanded with instructions that the trial court eliminate the violations for which appellant was found not guilty. See Hill v. State, 439 So.2d 1010, 1011 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Landry v. State, 380 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHEB and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baugher v. State, 468 So. 2d 441, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1112, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13808 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

468 So. 2d 441 (Baugher v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Landry v. State
380 So. 2d 1191 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Hill v. State
439 So. 2d 1010 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)