Baugher v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Baugher v. State

468 So. 2d 441, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1112, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13808

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 3, 1985

DocketNo. 84-2055

StatusPublished

This text of 468 So. 2d 441 (Baugher v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baugher v. State, 468 So. 2d 441, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1112, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13808 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error; therefore, the revocation of appellant’s probation is affirmed. However, we remand this case to the trial court for correction of the order of revocation.

Appellant was charged with violating the conditions of his probation by failing to pay the costs of his supervision, failing to maintain employment, and possessing and selling marijuana. At the probation revocation hearing, the trial court found the appellant guilty only of selling marijuana and failing to pay the costs of his supervision. The trial court’s written order, however, found the appellant guilty of all the charges alleged in the violation of probation affidavit. Since the order varies from the court’s oral findings, the case is remanded with instructions that the trial court eliminate the violations for which appellant was found not guilty. See Hill v. State, 439 So.2d 1010, 1011 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Landry v. State, 380 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHEB and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error; therefore, the revocation of appellant’s probation is affirmed. However, we remand this case to the trial court for correction of the order of revocation.

Appellant was charged with violating the conditions of his probation by failing to pay the costs of his supervision, failing to maintain employment, and possessing and selling marijuana. At the probation revocation hearing, the trial court found the appellant guilty only of selling marijuana and failing to pay the costs of his supervision. The trial court’s written order, however, found the appellant guilty of all the charges alleged in the violation of probation affidavit. Since the order varies from the court’s oral findings, the case is remanded with instructions that the trial court eliminate the violations for which appellant was found not guilty. See Hill v. State, 439 So.2d 1010, 1011 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Landry v. State, 380 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHEB and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

468 So. 2d 441, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1112, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baugher-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack