Baugh v. State

154 So. 2d 674, 42 Ala. App. 689
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided November 6, 1962·No. 7 Div. 697·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

Habeas corpus on extradition.

Apart from this case involving the demand of Tennessee for Baugh to he brought back to face a charge of burglary, in all other material aspects it resembles Chavers. v. State, 41 Ala.App. 585, 143 So.2d 187.

Affirmed.

Reversed and rendered on authority of 275 Ala. 319, 154 So.2d 674.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baugh v. State, 154 So. 2d 674, 42 Ala. App. 689 (Ala. Ct. App. 1962).

154 So. 2d 674 (Baugh v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Krenwinkel v. State
232 So. 2d 346 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1970)
Beasley v. State
187 So. 2d 806 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1966)
Stinson v. State
179 So. 2d 94 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1965)
State v. West
178 So. 2d 182 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1965)
State v. Freeman
160 So. 2d 12 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1964)