Baugh v. State

154 So. 2d 674, 42 Ala. App. 689
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 6, 1962
Docket7 Div. 697
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 154 So. 2d 674 (Baugh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baugh v. State, 154 So. 2d 674, 42 Ala. App. 689 (Ala. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

Habeas corpus on extradition.

Apart from this case involving the demand of Tennessee for Baugh to he brought back to face a charge of burglary, in all other material aspects it resembles Chavers. v. State, 41 Ala.App. 585, 143 So.2d 187.

Affirmed.

Reversed and rendered on authority of 275 Ala. 319, 154 So.2d 674.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Krenwinkel v. State
232 So. 2d 346 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1970)
Beasley v. State
187 So. 2d 806 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1966)
Stinson v. State
179 So. 2d 94 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1965)
State v. West
178 So. 2d 182 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1965)
State v. Freeman
160 So. 2d 12 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 So. 2d 674, 42 Ala. App. 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baugh-v-state-alactapp-1962.