Baugh v. Hudson

1915 OK 941, 153 P. 289, 54 Okla. 269, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1306

Opinion

Opinion by

DEVEREUX, C.

(after stating the facts as above). The judgment in this case is a final judgment, because it dismisses the action, and there is no motion for a new trial, nor is there any. certificate of the clerk which will enable us to review the record as a transcript. There is therefore nothing before this court. Stanard v. Sampson, 23 Okla. 13, 99 Pac. 796; Boyd v. Bryan, 11 Okla. 56, 65 Pac. 940; Bradford v. Brennan, 15 Okla. 47, 78 Pac. 387; Ahren-Ott Mfg. Co. v. Condon, 23 Okla. 365, 100 Pac. 556.

As there is no certificate of the clerk authenticating' this as a transcript, this court is without jurisdiction to consider any errors which might appear on the face of the record .

We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.