Baugh v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Baugh v. Hudson

1915 OK 941, 153 P. 289, 54 Okla. 269, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1306

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 16, 1915

Docket5262

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1915 OK 941 (Baugh v. Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baugh v. Hudson, 1915 OK 941, 153 P. 289, 54 Okla. 269, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1306 (Okla. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

DEVEREUX, C.

(after stating the facts as above). The judgment in this case is a final judgment, because it dismisses the action, and there is *271 no motion for a new trial, nor is there any. certificate of the clerk which will enable us to review the record as a transcript. There is therefore nothing before this court. Stanard v. Sampson, 23 Okla. 13, 99 Pac. 796; Boyd v. Bryan, 11 Okla. 56, 65 Pac. 940; Bradford v. Brennan, 15 Okla. 47, 78 Pac. 387; Ahren-Ott Mfg. Co. v. Condon, 23 Okla. 365, 100 Pac. 556.

As there is no certificate of the clerk authenticating' this as a transcript, this court is without jurisdiction to consider any errors which might appear on the face of the record .

We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

DEVEREUX, C.

(after stating the facts as above). The judgment in this case is a final judgment, because it dismisses the action, and there is *271 no motion for a new trial, nor is there any. certificate of the clerk which will enable us to review the record as a transcript. There is therefore nothing before this court. Stanard v. Sampson, 23 Okla. 13, 99 Pac. 796; Boyd v. Bryan, 11 Okla. 56, 65 Pac. 940; Bradford v. Brennan, 15 Okla. 47, 78 Pac. 387; Ahren-Ott Mfg. Co. v. Condon, 23 Okla. 365, 100 Pac. 556.

As there is no certificate of the clerk authenticating' this as a transcript, this court is without jurisdiction to consider any errors which might appear on the face of the record .

We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1915 OK 941, 153 P. 289, 54 Okla. 269, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baugh-v-hudson-okla-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack