Baugh v. Detroit, City of

• Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
• Decided: July 2, 2024
• Docket: 2:24-cv-11177
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JIMMIE BAUGH,

Plaintiff, Case No. 24-cv-11177 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman v. CITY OF DETROIT, et al.,

Defendants. __________________________________________________________________/ ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

On May 2, 2024, Plaintiff Jimmie Baugh filed this civil-rights action against Defendants JoAnne Miller, the City of Detroit, and the Wayne County Prosecutor’s Office. (See Compl., ECF No. 1.) The City has now filed a motion to dismiss Baugh’s claims against it pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (See Mot., ECF No. 5.) One of the bases for the motion is that Baugh has failed to plead sufficient facts in support of some of his claims under the Supreme Court’s decisions in Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009), and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007).1 (See, e.g., id,, PageID.44-48.)

1 The City has also raised other defenses to Baugh’s claims. (See Mot., ECF No. 5, PageID.40-44.) Without expressing any view regarding the merits of the City’s argument that Baugh’s factual allegations are insufficient, the Court will grant Baugh the

opportunity to file a First Amended Complaint in order to remedy the alleged deficiencies in his allegations. The Court does not anticipate allowing Baugh another opportunity to amend to add factual allegations that he could now include in

his First Amended Complaint. Simply put, this is Baugh’s opportunity to amend his allegations to cure the alleged deficiencies in his claims. By July 16, 2024, Baugh shall file a notice on the docket in this action notifying the Court and Defendants whether he will amend his Complaint. If Baugh

provides notice that he will be filing a First Amended Complaint, he shall file that amended pleading by no later than July 30, 2024. If Baugh provides notice that he will not be filing a First Amended Complaint, he shall respond to the City’s motion

to dismiss by no later than July 30, 2024. Finally, if Baugh provides notice that he will be filing a First Amended Complaint, the Court will terminate without prejudice the City’s currently-pending motion to dismiss as moot. The City may file a renewed motion directed at the First

Amended Complaint if it believes that such a motion is appropriate after reviewing that pleading. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Matthew F. Leitman MATTHEW F. LEITMAN Dated: July 2, 2024 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on July 2, 2024, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. s/Holly A. Ryan Case Manager (313) 234-5126