Bauer v. Fedex Freight East

813 N.W.2d 811, 2012 WL 1549997, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 169
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedApril 25, 2012
DocketNo. A11-2021
StatusPublished

This text of 813 N.W.2d 811 (Bauer v. Fedex Freight East) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bauer v. Fedex Freight East, 813 N.W.2d 811, 2012 WL 1549997, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 169 (Mich. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 12, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of relator for oral argument be, and the same is, denied as moot.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Lorie S. Gildea Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
813 N.W.2d 811, 2012 WL 1549997, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bauer-v-fedex-freight-east-minn-2012.