Bauer v. Bauer
This text of 28 A.3d 336 (Bauer v. Bauer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Barbara BAUER
v.
Steven BAUER.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Kimberly A. Knox, Kenneth J. Bartschi and Wesley W. Morton, Hartford, in support of the petition.
Steven R. Dembo, Hartford, in opposition.
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 130 Conn.App. 185, 21 A.3d 964, is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court's clarification regarding the division of the defendant's pension accounts amounted to an impermissible modification of the dissolution judgment?"
*337 EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 A.3d 336, 302 Conn. 926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bauer-v-bauer-conn-2011.