Bauer v. Bauer
201 Cal. 770
This text of 201 Cal. 770 (Bauer v. Bauer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bauer v. Bauer, 201 Cal. 770 (Cal. 1927).
Opinion
The preliminary statement made in Hamilton A. Bauer et al. v. Lily M. Bauer et al., ante, p. 267 [256 Pac. 820], is applicable in all respects to the instant case. We therefore adopt the decision formerly rendered in this case, which was vacated upon the order granting the petition for rehearing, as our decision in the instant case. It follows:
[771]*771“This is an action on behalf of certain heirs and legatees of Emile Baner, deceased, to recover to his estate certain stock of the Occidental Life Insurance Company, which plaintiffs allege was procured by Lloyd C. Bauer, one of the defendants, from Emile Bauer in his lifetime by fraud and undue influence. The principle involved in this case is identical with the principal involved in the case of Hamilton A. Bauer et al. v. Lily M. Bauer et al., ante, p. 267 [256 Pac. 820]. On the authority of that case, therefore, the judgment in this case is affirmed.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bauer v. Bauer
256 P. 820 (California Supreme Court, 1927)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
201 Cal. 770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bauer-v-bauer-cal-1927.