Baudrig v. Powers

Michigan Superior Court, Grand Rapids

Baudrig v. Powers

1 How. N.P. 10

CourtMichigan Superior Court, Grand Rapids

DecidedMarch 15, 1883

StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. N.P. 10 (Baudrig v. Powers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Superior Court, Grand Rapids primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baudrig v. Powers, 1 How. N.P. 10 (Mich. Super. Ct. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court,

Parrish J.,

held that when an action is brought against two or more defendants and one dies,, the suit cannot be revived against the administrator of' such deceased defendant; that the case must proceed, if [11]*11at all, against the surviving defendants. The proceedings to revive are entirely statutory, and are not authorized in such cases. 2 C. L., 5824, page 1686.

Decided March, 1883. Sliter & Rogers for plaintiffs. Taggert, Stone & Earle for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court,

Parrish J.,

held that when an action is brought against two or more defendants and one dies,, the suit cannot be revived against the administrator of' such deceased defendant; that the case must proceed, if [11]*11at all, against the surviving defendants. The proceedings to revive are entirely statutory, and are not authorized in such cases. 2 C. L., 5824, page 1686.

Decided March, 1883. Sliter & Rogers for plaintiffs. Taggert, Stone & Earle for defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 How. N.P. 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baudrig-v-powers-michsuperctgrap-1883.