Baucum, William
This text of Baucum, William (Baucum, William) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-90,519-02
EX PARTE WILLIAM BAUCUM, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 16F0100-202-B IN THE 202ND DISTRICT COURT FROM BOWIE COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of four counts of aggravated sexual assault and sentenced to
concurrent terms of thirty years’ imprisonment. Applicant, through habeas counsel, filed this
application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded
it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that his guilty pleas were involuntary, that trial counsel provided
ineffective assistance, and that he was denied due process. The habeas record contains a response
from trial counsel, but there are no credibility determinations from the trial court or trial court
findings resolving the disputed factual issues. 2
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Accordingly, the record
should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM .
PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in
Article 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall make credibility determinations and shall make findings
of fact and conclusions of law as to Applicant’s habeas claims. The trial court may make any other
findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate.
The trial court shall make its credibility determinations and findings of fact and conclusions
of law within ninety days from the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately
forward to this Court the trial court’s findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand,
including, among other things, affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions,
orders, and transcripts from hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any
extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: March 11, 2020 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Baucum, William, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baucum-william-texcrimapp-2020.