Baucom v. Baucom

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Baucom v. Baucom

154 S.E.2d 517, 270 N.C. 452, 1967 N.C. LEXIS 1377

DecidedMay 24, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 154 S.E.2d 517 (Baucom v. Baucom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baucom v. Baucom, 154 S.E.2d 517, 270 N.C. 452, 1967 N.C. LEXIS 1377 (N.C. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It seems all matters in controversy have been settled except the question whether the defendant should be required to contribute to the support of Michael Tyson Baucom. Judge Mc-Kinnon found he is 17 years old and employed at the income above disclosed. The record does not show whether the employment is regular or for a few weeks during school vacation. If the employment is regular and the boy is supporting himself, the Court, on defendant’s motion, may make any appropriate change in the order.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It seems all matters in controversy have been settled except the question whether the defendant should be required to contribute to the support of Michael Tyson Baucom. Judge Mc-Kinnon found he is 17 years old and employed at the income above disclosed. The record does not show whether the employment is regular or for a few weeks during school vacation. If the employment is regular and the boy is supporting himself, the Court, on defendant’s motion, may make any appropriate change in the order.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

154 S.E.2d 517, 270 N.C. 452, 1967 N.C. LEXIS 1377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baucom-v-baucom-nc-1967.