Batts v. Batts

600 So. 2d 1301, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6791, 1992 WL 143600
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 26, 1992·No. No. 91-2062·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

The issue raised on this appeal by Jeffrey Batts (former husband) is whether there was competent evidence from which the trial court could have concluded that a substantial change of circumstances had occurred in order to support an increase in child support. Based on our reading of sections 61.13 and 61.14(1), Florida Statutes (1989), we agree with the trial court that there was competent substantial evidence establishing a substantial change in circumstances.

As to the issues raised by the former wife on cross-appeal, we reverse. In calculating a modified child support amount, the trial court incorrectly allowed a deduction from the former husband’s gross income which represented the amount he was currently paying in child support. This contravenes section 61.-30(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1989). Additionally, an increased award of child support should be made retroactive to the time when a petition for modification of a domestic judgment of dissolution is filed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.

GOSHORN, C.J., and DIAMANTIS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Batts v. Batts, 600 So. 2d 1301, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6791, 1992 WL 143600 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

600 So. 2d 1301 (Batts v. Batts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spano v. Bruce
62 So. 3d 2 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Knight v. Knight
702 So. 2d 242 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)