Batts, Ex Parte Fredrick Jordan

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 9, 2011
DocketAP-76,513
StatusPublished

This text of Batts, Ex Parte Fredrick Jordan (Batts, Ex Parte Fredrick Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Batts, Ex Parte Fredrick Jordan, (Tex. 2011).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. AP-76,513
EX PARTE FREDERICK JORDAN BATTS, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1091244-B IN THE 232ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of engaging in organized criminal activity and sentenced to twenty-five years' imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Batts v. State, No. 14-07-00865-CR (Tex. App. - Houston [14th Dist.] November 17, 2009).

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed, thereby denying Applicant the opportunity to petition this Court for discretionary review.

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to notify Applicant of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se, advising him instead that he saw no grounds for a petition for discretionary review. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 14-07-00865-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case No. 1091244 from the 232nd Judicial District Court of Harris County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with the Fourteenth Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court's mandate issues.

Applicant's remaining claims are dismissed. See Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).



Delivered: March 9, 2011

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Wilson
956 S.W.2d 25 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Torres
943 S.W.2d 469 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Batts, Ex Parte Fredrick Jordan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/batts-ex-parte-fredrick-jordan-texcrimapp-2011.