Battles v. Miller

2 F. Cas. 1037, 3 Cranch 296, 3 D.C. 296

This text of 2 F. Cas. 1037 (Battles v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Battles v. Miller, 2 F. Cas. 1037, 3 Cranch 296, 3 D.C. 296 (circtddc 1828).

Opinion

CRANCH, Chief Judge,

was of opinion that if the slave was sold by the importer within the three years, the importer is not protected by the 2d section of the act of 1796, c. 67, from the prohibition contained in the first section. The 1st section contains the general principle—the prohibition to import slaves. The 2d section contains the exception in favor of those who come to reside. The 3d section is an exception to the second. If the case be within the 3d section, it is not within the 2d, and if not within the 2d it is within the first. He was also of opinion that it was immaterial whether the sale was made in or out of the county of Washington. Verdict for the petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 F. Cas. 1037, 3 Cranch 296, 3 D.C. 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/battles-v-miller-circtddc-1828.