Battles v. Florida State Hospital

863 So. 2d 1259, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 56, 2004 WL 34739
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 8, 2004
DocketNo. 1D03-1602
StatusPublished

This text of 863 So. 2d 1259 (Battles v. Florida State Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Battles v. Florida State Hospital, 863 So. 2d 1259, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 56, 2004 WL 34739 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Judge of Compensation Claims has informed the parties that a transcript of the testimony of three witnesses who appeared at the attorney’s fee hearing in this matter cannot be prepared, and the parties have indicated to this court that they are unable to provide a satisfactory substitute for the transcript. Under these circumstances, we are constrained to reverse the order on appeal and remand the matter for a hearing de novo. See Arnold Lumber Co. v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

ALLEN, DAVIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arnold Lumber Company v. Harris
469 So. 2d 786 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
863 So. 2d 1259, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 56, 2004 WL 34739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/battles-v-florida-state-hospital-fladistctapp-2004.