Home/Superior Court of North Carolina/Battle v. . Yates

Battle v. . Yates

3 N.C. 304
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided July 5, 1804·Published

Opinion

declared his opinion that the application of the surplus by the executor was proper.

And the petition was dismissed.

NOTE. — See Dickens v. Cotton, 22 N.C. 272, and White v. Green,36 N.C. 45, which recognize the rule that an undisposed surplus is the proper fund to be first applied to the payment of debts. See, also, Boon v.Rea, 36 N.C. 71. *Page 274

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Battle v. . Yates, 3 N.C. 304 (N.C. Ct. App. 1804).

3 N.C. 304 (Battle v. . Yates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

White v. . Green
36 N.C. 45 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1840)
Boon v. . Rea
36 N.C. 71 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1840)
Dicken v. Cotton
22 N.C. 272 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1839)