Home/Superior Court of North Carolina/Battle v. . Yates

Battle v. . Yates

3 N.C. 304
CourtSuperior Court of North Carolina
DecidedJuly 5, 1804
StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.C. 304 (Battle v. . Yates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Battle v. . Yates, 3 N.C. 304 (N.C. Ct. App. 1804).

Opinion

declared his opinion that the application of the surplus by the executor was proper.

And the petition was dismissed.

NOTE. — See Dickens v. Cotton, 22 N.C. 272, and White v. Green,36 N.C. 45, which recognize the rule that an undisposed surplus is the proper fund to be first applied to the payment of debts. See, also, Boon v.Rea, 36 N.C. 71. *Page 274

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White v. . Green
36 N.C. 45 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1840)
Boon v. . Rea
36 N.C. 71 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1840)
Dicken v. Cotton
22 N.C. 272 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1839)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 N.C. 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/battle-v-yates-ncsuperct-1804.