Battle v. Thomson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Battle v. Thomson

103 A.D.3d 630, 958 N.Y.S.2d 623

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 6, 2013

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 103 A.D.3d 630 (Battle v. Thomson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Battle v. Thomson, 103 A.D.3d 630, 958 N.Y.S.2d 623 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (McGrady, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated October 24, 2011, as dismissed her petition to modify an order of custody and visitation dated July 22, 2010.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

[631]*631The mother contends that the Family Court erred in dismissing her petition to modify an order of custody and visitation dated July 22, 2010, without a full hearing and without considering, inter alia, the reports of the therapeutic social worker. However, this Court’s decision and order in Matter of Thomson v Battle (99 AD3d 804 [2012]), which reversed the order dated July 22, 2010, and remitted the matter to the Family Court, Queens County, for a new hearing, renders the issue raised by the mother academic. Accordingly, her appeal must be dismissed as academic. Dillon, J.P., Angiolillo, Leventhal and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (McGrady, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated October 24, 2011, as dismissed her petition to modify an order of custody and visitation dated July 22, 2010.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

[631]*631The mother contends that the Family Court erred in dismissing her petition to modify an order of custody and visitation dated July 22, 2010, without a full hearing and without considering, inter alia, the reports of the therapeutic social worker. However, this Court’s decision and order in Matter of Thomson v Battle (99 AD3d 804 [2012]), which reversed the order dated July 22, 2010, and remitted the matter to the Family Court, Queens County, for a new hearing, renders the issue raised by the mother academic. Accordingly, her appeal must be dismissed as academic. Dillon, J.P., Angiolillo, Leventhal and Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 A.D.3d 630, 958 N.Y.S.2d 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/battle-v-thomson-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack