Battle v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Battle v. State

159 S.W.3d 440, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 147, 2005 WL 147425

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Battle v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 25 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 25, 2005·No. No. ED 84294·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Demetrius N. Battle, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The [441]*441findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Demetrius N. Battle, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The [441]*441findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Battle v. State, 159 S.W.3d 440, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 147, 2005 WL 147425 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

159 S.W.3d 440 (Battle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.